|
Marriage, Family and Society
The Tibetan race favored marriage on the basis of both
class and blood relationship. Marriage on the basis of class
was the product of class oppression in old Tibet which followed
feudal serfdom. It disappeared with the establishment of the
socialist system. Although such a marriage system is still
fresh in the minds of many Tibetans, it is collapsing. In
Bangjor Lhunbo village, there are two families of a manorial
lord and blacksmith, still following the old marriage system.
Their children, however, study in schools together with children
of other classes. They are highly likely to discard the marriage
system in the future. In the village today, there is no visible
demarcation line between ex-tralpa serfs and exnangzen slaves.
Young people enjoy freedom to marry whom they want.
 |
From Table 5, we see free marriage making up 70.8 percent
of the total. Actually, Tibetans respect the will of the people
concerned in marriage, with freedom in love being the social
traditional. Even when people get married according to the
will of their parents, the couple still have to agree to the
marriage. In old Tibet, the manorial lord and rich tralpa
serfs followed the form of marriage according to parents'
will and through match-makers. This shows society's interference
in individual affairs. Marriage proceeded, firstly, out of
family interest and, secondly, taking into consideration individual
will. So far as ordinary serf families were concerned, marriage
proceeded, firstly, according to individual will and, secondly,
out of family interest. The two kinds of marriage took place
within the same class. Today, when such a class system no
longer exists, the Tibetan tradition of freedom in love has
revived as the main trend in Tibetan rural areas. Those who
favor marriage according to their parents' will or through
match-makers belong to a small number of rich families wishing
to maintain their family economic might, or people seeking
remarriage, those of a mature age or of an introverted temperament.
Free marriage leads to the marriage age being postponed
in Bangjor Lhunbo village, with many young people remaining
unmarried even though well over the traditional marriage age.
Before the Democratic Reform, some in the village married
when they were well under 20 years of age, while many got
married after reaching that stage. Today, many young people
get married when they have become "old" in terms
of the traditional marriage age. In the village, there are
still 13 people who, though 25 or older, are not yet married,
comprising three men and
10 women. No wonder a folk song goes: "Girls from Bangjor
Lhunbo village have difficulty getting married".
The old tend to think this has something to do with two
factors: First, the young have higher demands on marriage
quality; second, modern contraceptive methods pose a devastating
challenge to the old marital process characteristic of engaging
in love-trial marriage-becoming pregnant-getting married.
In the past, when people engaged in a trial marriage, they
were inevitably prone to an early pregnancy, thus becoming
natural spouses. Today, however, trial marriage is prolonged
as contraceptives are readily available. As a matter of fact,
there is a third reason: Bangjor Lhunbo village has become
so developed economically that many village natives hate to
be married outside the community and risk a lower standard
of living.
 |
Free marriage produces families with comparatively poor
stability. The above table shows that of the 113 married people,
77 percent belong to the first marriage group; 10 are divorced
with five of them having remarried. According to our investigation,
there are people who divorced four times and remarried five
times. Of the widows/widowers, two have remarried, but 10
have not. Most of these are old. There are also four women
who conceived and became mothers outside marriage (another
one later married and is not included). For various reasons,
they have not been able to marry their lovers: Gedain Sangino,
the aforementioned nangzen slave, was prevented from marrying
under feudal serfdom; a middle-aged woman, who became pregnant
when taking part in road repair work, was not married because
her lover disappeared; two other young women failed to win
the affection of their lovers. Of the five who divorced and
have not remarried, the main reason appears to be that, as
their spouse had committed adultery, they lost confidence
in remarrying. As a result, the divorce rate is 8.8 percent
in Bangjor Lhunbo village. However, the whole village respects
individual will in marriage and everyone is very lenient toward
trial marriage or divorce. And illegitimate children are not
discriminated against.
Free marriage in Bangjor Lhunbo village also shows considerable
equality in terms of the marital home. Of 48 couples surveyed,
22 couples (45.8 percent) involved the wives marrying into
the home of their husbands; 24 couples (50 percent) involved
the husbands marrying into the home of their wives; the remaining
two couples remained independent. In large families, most
have the sons-in-law living with the wives' families. A survey
of 16 families shows 11 households following this style, while
the five others involved the daughters-in-law living with
their husbands' families. The older generation explain this
by saying that daughters are very obedient, so it is nicer
to live with them than with daughters-in-law.
The above table clearly shows with whom the married women
live after marriage. In "others" the figure "1"
refers to a childless old lady who receives guaranteed food,
clothing, medical care, housing and burial expenses from the
local government, and so lives independently.
A survey of 60 married women (excluding three mothers who
have no husbands), shows the following trend in intermarriage:
The table shows the rate of intermarriage within Gyangze County
is the highest, followed by the rate "inside the township",
"inside the village", "inside the region"
and "inside Tibet". Given the fact of poor economic
development, the local people tend to favor intermarriage
with non-blood-relations mainly within the country or township.
With the disappearance of the traditional natural economy,
the scope of intermarriage is expanding along with the expanding
scope of social
intercourse, reaching 11.67 percent for "inside the region
and Tibet." The rate of intermarriage within Bangjor
Lhunbo village (23.33, ranldng third in the table) is higher
than other villages in Tibet, mainly because 75 percent of
the villagers were nangzen slaves in old Tibet. With the smashing
of the strata alongside changes in social system, ex-nangzen
slaves and ex-tralpa slaves gained freedom in marriage.
The former practice of freedom in love, trial marriage and
marriage leads people in Bangjor Lhunbo Village to have little
interest in a wedding ceremony. A survey of the married women
shows only 42 percent held a traditional wedding ceremony,
with the middle-aged favoring a simple wedding rite; 58 percent
held no wedding ceremony at all. The style of the wedding
ceremony depends on wealth. Before the Democratic Reform in
1959, no nangzen slaves had money for a wedding ceremony;
comparatively rich tralpa serfs, however, attached importance
to such formal rites. During the people's commune period,
a wedding ceremony was held in a simple way, generally lasting
one day. In the last decade, however, an increasing number
of couples have held wedding ceremonies, generally lasting
three or four days. This is the result of economic progress
in the village.
Unlike young couples who favor wedding ceremonies, there
are few middle-aged who do so. During the people's commune
period, more middle-aged registered for formal marriage than
their older and younger counterparts. Of the married now,
however, only 13.33 percent have registered for formal marriage,
reflecting relaxed social control. Freedom in love and marriage,
plus relaxed social control, leads to greater freedom and
diversity in marriage form. While the overwhelming majority
of the people follow the monogamous system, there are still
cases of polygamy, polyandry and unmarried mothers in the
village. This is shown in Table 9.
Before the Democratic Reform, there were only two tralpa
serf households which practiced a different marriage form.
In one tralpa serf household, the elder brother was involved
in military service and the younger brother gradually became
the second husband of his wife. In another tralpa serf household,
when the husband died, the wife remarried. When the daughter
of her first husband grew up, the girl she became the second
wife of her stepfather. Such a situation no longer exists
with the death of the elder brother in the first case and
the death of the mother in the second. So long as the blood
relations were not offended, polygamy and polyandry were allowed.
One old villager told us his son-in-law failed to marry his
second daughter, with the result that she had to marry outside
the village. "I have the feeling that I have lost one
arm," he explained. "If my two daughters could marry
the same husband, my family would not be so poor economically."
However, the villagers especially favor the polyandry system,
on the ground that it means more than one able-bodied laborer.
When control on polygamy and polyandry was relaxed during
the people's commune period, these practices made a comeback.
The four existing households still following the system were
formed after 1978. Except for one household involving brothers
of the same mother, but different fathers, who have the same
wife through family arrangement, three other households were
formed naturally. In one household, the two men were friends
and the second man and the wife worked together in a warehouse
during the people's commune period. When the fiNt man had
difficulty supporting the family, the two men moved to the
same house after family consultation. One household belongs
to brothers sharing the same wife. When the brother grew up,
he slept with his sister-in-law and had children. One household
belongs to sisters sharing the same husband. When the younger
sister grew up and had children with her brother-in-law, the
polygamous family was formed. Such a process, of course, required
the consent of the first husband or wife. In another case,
when the elder brother had married, his mother intended to
let her second son marry his sister-in-law. But the young
couple objected, so the mother had no way out but to marry
her younger son to a woman m Kangmar County with whom she
went to live, leaving no property to her elder son and daughter-in-law.
However, the fact is that 83.19 percent of the people follow
the monogamous system. And the government also warns the villagers
that polygamy and polyandry do not conform to the PRC Marriage
Law. CPC members and government officials are banned from
following the polygamous and polyandrous systems, while ordinary
people are just encouraged to adopt monogamy.
Freedom in love and marriage also means that families in
Bangjor Lhunbo village are almost too diversified in form
to be grouped together according to marriage form. We divided
them into the core families composed of parents and dependent
children; trunk families composed of more than three generations,
with parents living together with one married child, grandchildren
(including children of their daughters) and their dependents;
united families composed of more than three generations, with
parents living together with over two married couples, grandchildren
(including children of their daughters) and their dependents;
and incomplete families characteristic of unmarried mothers
and their children, and divorcees. These four kinds of families
are shown in Table 10. But the trunk families and united families
are not divided in a perfect way, because the two united families
belong to families with parents living together with their
dependent children, one married couple, grandchildren, plus
children of their unmarried child or a divorced child and
offspring. In this case, therefore, are not two married couples
living under one roof. If the two kinds of families are put
into one expanded families, Bangjor Lhunbo village is composed
of core families (43.2 percent), expanded families (40.9 percent)
and incomplete families (15.9 percent). From this, we see
the trend for the core families to evolve into expanded families
which split into new core families, instead of being incomplete
families evolving from the births of unmarried mothers, divorce,
deaths and natural disasters.
Of the seven incomplete families, two are composed of unmarried
mothers and their children; two of divorced mothers and children;
one of widow and children; one of a child whose mother remarried
after his father's death and who was supported by his aunt;
and one childless old lady who is guaranteed in food, clothing,
medical care, housing and burial expenses. Obviously, women
in the village bear the brunt of risks resulting from family
changes, and this is also the result of free marriage. The
village committee intends to fine unmarried births and related
social problems.
There are 265 residents in Bangjor Lhunbo village (excluding
the one childless old lady referred to in the previous paragraph).
Families are large in size, averaging 6.16 persons. Nine of
the 19 core families have an average of six or more people.
The size of incomplete families keeps shrinking to an average
of two per family (four people for the largest incomplete
family). The villagers have the intention of expanding their
family size. In the village, there are 10 families which have
expanded their family size through polygamy and polyandry,
remarriage, adoption of children with no blood relations,
or taking in people who may or may not be relatives. This
is the direct result of an incomplete old-age pension system
and the need to fight natural disasters. They include one
old man who receives support from hjs adopted daughter and
her family. When the old man's brother retired, he joined
the family. There is another family composed of three children
supported by their aunt, after their mother died and their
father remarried. Another reason for these families to expand
is the economic structure characteristic of household land
tilling and livestock breeding, which calls for more land
and more able-bodied laborers. All the rich families in Bangjor
Lhunbo village feature large populations, which means an ample
supply of able-bodied laborers and more land. Incomplete families
characteristic of less land and less able-bodied laborers
include one cadre's family, the childless old lady, and the
five poorest families.
Although intermarriage holds sway, equal stress is laid
on social relations associated with both parents. In a natural
economic society which features traditional farming and livestock
breeding, families constitute the basic subsistence entity
in production and life. Such families, however, expand to
the point where no blood ties exist. In the Qinghai-Tibet
Plateau, people face harsh conditions in subsistence, and
the production seasons are short. This, plus frequently occurring
natural calamities, pose greater living difficulties. This
points up the need for mutual aid and cooperation.
In order to cope with the need for wedding and fimeral ceremonies,
people in Bangjor Lhunbo village form gyido ties for mutual
help. In Tibetan, gyido means "association for wedding
and fimeral ceremonies" prevalent in China's hinterland.
When a family holds a wedding or fimeral ceremony, or a Buddhist
mass, other members of the gyido network which the concerned
family attends will help with money and materials, plus manpower.
For rich families, 10-15 families form a gyido in total disregard
of blood relations or whether these families come from the
same village. For the poorest families, who generally do not
form such a gyido association, only two or three families,
with blood ties, get together for the purpose. Given the fact
that gyido features economic assistance, Bangjor Lhunbo families
refrain from forming new gyido associations. As a result,
the organization of gyido in the village is stable. When one
family builds a new house, the whole village will volunteer
to help.
The above shows the three social mutual aid networks in Bangjor
Lhunbo village: The first features families lunctioning as
the basic unit in production and life, which expand and operate
on the basis of blood relations; the second is composed of
gyido ties; and the third features inner-village mutual help.
All the three networks expand on the basis of families. Such
traditional ties, however, are confronted with threats on
two fronts:
The first is the development of the commodity economy. Families
with weak labor power but access to income, such as families
of cadres, tend to employ their own labor instead of seeking
help through gyido ties. Families with strong labor power
refrain from seeking help through gyido ties, too. Nonetheless,
Bangjor Lhunbo village is still a traditional society. Even
the above two kinds of families have to seek traditional aid.
Though money works to replace gyido in the busy farming seasons
and housing construction in certain cases, gyido ties still
hold sway in the village on the whole.
The second is the government administrative ties and the
community service system which, introduced from 1966 to 1976,
has always been working effectively. Government decisions
and policies promote rural development in Tibet; advanced
production mode and production tools boost production and
enhance the standard of living. All these are altering the
nature of the rural areas in the autonomous region, and taking
the place of traditional ties. When the government sells diesel
oil at a low cost, tractors serve farmers charging an affordable
price. This helps ease labor power shortage during the busy
farming and harvesting seasons. When the CPC members and cadres
help the poor to get rid of poverty and when the poor families
have priority for its members to work in township enterprises,
the poor and those without access to aid can keep abreast
with others in economic development, too. With the popularization
of agrotechnology, free medical treatment for sick domestic
animals, materials supplied at affordable prices, free schooling,
free medicare and low interest bank loans, the government
provides the farmers with needed care. In the meantime, there
is development in communication, telecommunications and mass
media, which help instill new ideas into the mind of the rural
residents. These influence changes in the rural areas, too.
|